Technology · News
T-Mobile Keeps 5G Standalone Lead as AT&T and Verizon Trail, Opensignal Finds
Published:

In brief
T-Mobile customers connect to true 5G standalone (SA) service 71.2% of the time, versus 20.2% for Verizon and just 4.4% for AT&T, according to new Opensignal analysis published in October 2026. AT&T posts the fastest download and upload speeds among the three carriers, but on a much smaller slice of its network footprint.
New network-performance data from analytics firm Opensignal shows T-Mobile holding a wide lead over AT&T and Verizon on 5G standalone (SA) availability, even as AT&T edges ahead on raw speed, according to coverage of the report by TmoNews and SammyGuru.
What the report measured
5G standalone, or 5G SA, is a network architecture that runs entirely on 5G infrastructure rather than borrowing parts of a carrier's existing 4G LTE core. It generally enables lower latency and supports more advanced network features than non-standalone 5G, which still relies on 4G signaling underneath.
Opensignal tracks how often real subscribers' phones are actually connected to each type of signal, rather than only measuring where a carrier claims coverage exists. The firm's October 2026 analysis, cited by TmoNews and SammyGuru, found T-Mobile users connected to 5G SA 71.2% of the time they used their phones, compared with 20.2% for Verizon customers and 4.4% for AT&T customers.
The numbers side by side
| Metric | T-Mobile | AT&T | Verizon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5G SA availability (time connected) | 71.2% | 4.4% | 20.2% |
| Latency | 40.2 ms | 40.6 ms | 42.9 ms |
| Consistent Quality score | 85.1% | 88.9% | 86.4% |
On latency, T-Mobile again came out on top at 40.2 milliseconds, just ahead of AT&T at 40.6 ms and Verizon at 42.9 ms, per TmoNews' summary of the report.
Where AT&T pulls ahead
AT&T recorded the fastest 5G SA speeds of the three carriers, with average download speeds of 344.7 Mbps and upload speeds of 22.6 Mbps, according to the TmoNews report. AT&T also led on Opensignal's Consistent Quality metric, a measure of how reliably a connection meets a quality threshold needed for everyday tasks like video calls, at 88.9%, ahead of Verizon's 86.4% and T-Mobile's 85.1%.
Opensignal noted that AT&T's faster speeds may partly reflect a smaller, less congested pool of SA users rather than a faster network overall, since only 4.4% of AT&T traffic runs on SA, TmoNews reported.
Why T-Mobile's lead persists
The gap traces back partly to when each carrier built out nationwide 5G SA service. T-Mobile began rolling out 5G SA in 2019 and said it completed nationwide SA coverage in April 2025, according to TmoNews. AT&T did not switch on a nationwide SA network until October 2025, about six months later, and Verizon's rollout also came after T-Mobile's, though TmoNews did not give an exact nationwide-launch date for Verizon.
A separate, broader Opensignal Mobile Network Experience report covering the period from September to November 2025 — reported by BroadbandBreakfast — found T-Mobile winning 12 of the awards it issues for categories such as 5G Coverage Experience (scoring 8.3 out of 10) and Reliability Experience. In that same report, AT&T led Overall Time on Network, with users connected to a mobile broadband signal 99.6% of the time, narrowly ahead of Verizon at 99.5% and T-Mobile at 99.1%; AT&T won one award in total, while Verizon won three awards, including 5G Video Experience and 5G Live Video Experience.
Two different Opensignal reports, two different pictures
Readers should note the two sets of figures come from different Opensignal studies measuring different things: the September–November 2025 report scores general network experience across many categories, while the newer analysis covered by TmoNews and SammyGuru focuses specifically on how often phones are actually locked onto a 5G standalone signal and how that signal performs.
What this means for consumers
Opensignal's own framing, as relayed by BroadbandBreakfast, is that the firm measures
consumer experience rather than advertised speed and peak performance measured in tests
For most everyday use, that distinction matters: a carrier with lower peak speeds but much higher SA availability, like T-Mobile, may deliver more consistent access to newer network features across more of the country, while AT&T's higher measured speeds currently apply to a much smaller share of its customers' connections.
Questions
- Which US carrier has the best 5G coverage right now?
- According to Opensignal's October 2026 analysis, T-Mobile customers connect to 5G standalone service 71.2% of the time, far more often than Verizon (20.2%) or AT&T (4.4%), giving T-Mobile the widest practical 5G SA coverage of the three.
- Does AT&T have faster 5G than T-Mobile and Verizon?
- Yes, on raw speed: Opensignal measured AT&T's average 5G SA download speed at 344.7 Mbps and upload speed at 22.6 Mbps, the fastest of the three, though this applies to a much smaller share of AT&T's overall network traffic.
- What is 5G standalone (SA) and why does it matter?
- 5G SA is a network architecture that runs fully on 5G infrastructure instead of relying on a 4G LTE core underneath, typically enabling lower latency and more advanced features than non-standalone 5G.
- When did each carrier launch nationwide 5G SA?
- T-Mobile began rolling out 5G SA in 2019 and completed nationwide coverage in April 2025; AT&T did not switch on its nationwide SA network until October 2025, about six months later, and Verizon's rollout also came after T-Mobile's, according to TmoNews' reporting on the Opensignal data.
- Did T-Mobile win every category in Opensignal's testing?
- No. In a separate, broader Opensignal report covering September to November 2025, Verizon led in 5G Video Experience and 5G Live Video Experience, and AT&T led Overall Time on Network at 99.6%, even though T-Mobile won the most total awards (12).
Sources
This piece was prepared with artificial intelligence and passed an automated source check before publication. If you see an error, ask for a correction. Request a correction or reply · How we make this
Related

TechnologyComparison
PlayStation 5 Pro vs a Matching Gaming PC: Price and Performance Compared
Sony launched the PlayStation 5 Pro at $699.99 in November 2024, but according to Engadget's reporting its US price had climbed to roughly $900 by April 2026, and one October 2026 SlashGear estimate puts it near $1,580. A PC built around the GPU and CPU that benchmarkers consider closest to the console costs roughly $1,050 to $1,530 depending on the parts chosen, according to SlashGear and BGR testing.
TechnologyNews
Two Critical PHP Flaws Dubbed "PHP2Shell" Expose Most of the Web
Two critical PHP vulnerabilities nicknamed "PHP2Shell" let attackers run malicious code on web servers without logging in, according to the security firm that found them. Patches for CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 shipped on October 21, 2026, months after researchers first reported the bugs, and multiple firms have since logged exploitation attempts in the wild.

TechnologyList
Best Android Apps and Utilities You Can Get Outside Google Play Store
Android users are not limited to Google Play: the open-source repository F-Droid, the anonymous Google Play client Aurora Store, the update tracker Obtainium, and the Shizuku-based catalog ShizuStore all distribute apps that the official store does not list or allow. Here are nine stores and utilities worth knowing, based on their own listings and reporting from MakeUseOf and Pocket-lint.
TechnologyArticle
PHP2Shell: the two critical PHP flaws that pushed governments offline
PHP2Shell is the nickname for two critical, unauthenticated remote-code-execution flaws in the PHP programming language — CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 — disclosed on 20–21 October 2026. Because PHP powers a very large share of the world's websites, the flaws led several governments to take public sites offline as a precaution. The official fix is upgrading PHP; interim server-side mitigations exist, but there is little an individual reader can do beyond watching for breach notices and using strong, unique passwords.